Film Information
Original title: El Hoyo 2 (The Platform 2)
Italian title: Il Buco 2
Director: Galder Gaztelu-Urrutia
Year: 2024
Country: Spain
Genre: Dystopian, Drama, Horror
Runtime: 108 minutes
Screenplay: David Desola, Pedro Rivero
Main cast: Iván Massagué, Zorion Eguileor, Antonia San Juan, Emilio Buale, Alexandra Masangkay
Production: Basque Films, Mr. Miyagi Films
Distribution: Netflix

The Platform 2 is not a prequel in the traditional sense. It does not fill narrative gaps, nor does it provide explanatory backstory. It amplifies the opacity of the Pit, making visible its cyclical nature. The system does not require explanation in order to function. It operates, punishes, and renews itself. The film returns to the site of trauma, subjects it to new rituals, and yet preserves its fundamental unreadability. There is no evolution. Only reiteration.

The opening sequence establishes this logic with clarity. Children climb up and down a pyramidal structure in an atmosphere that is both playful and disturbingly sacred. The monument is not merely a playground. Its form recalls altars, war memorials, and mausoleums of memory. The pyramid, a visual archetype of power, becomes a trap of meaning. What appears as play already functions as ritual. Childhood, conventionally aligned with futurity, is immediately absorbed into a vertical loop that precedes it. The system does not wait for subjects to mature. It recruits them from the beginning.

Law in the Pit is not fixed, but elastic in its brutality. The so-called law of the four above requires the upper levels to guarantee order for those below. Any deviation is sanctioned. Those who intervene out of turn, interpret the rule, or attempt to modify its application are punished. Within this structure emerges the figure of Daghin Babi, the blind anointed one. He does not rule through cruelty, but through devotion. His blindness is functional. He does not interpret and does not mediate. He applies. In doing so, he embodies a form of power that presents obedience as virtue and severity as moral necessity.

Here absolute domination becomes legible not as excess, but as norm. Power manifests itself not only through violence, but through the transformation of obedience into ethical value. Daghin Babi is not a sadist. He is an administrator of zeal. The law, for him, admits no exception. Mercy becomes deviation. Interpretation becomes guilt. Order must be preserved even at the cost of mutilation, burning, or elimination. Violence is no longer an aberration. It is procedure.

The death of Zamiatin condenses this logic into a single gesture. His actions are minimal. He eats in secret, observes, remains silent. The system nonetheless identifies him as culpable. No act is neutral. In the Pit, power does not simply decide who lives and who dies. It determines how death is staged, circulated, and consumed. Zamiatin sets himself on fire and falls toward the lowest levels, where other bodies tear pieces from him. Death becomes nourishment. Not an end, but a continuation. One does not die to disappear, but to remain useful.

This is the regime of impersonal suffering. Pain is not returned through recognition, mourning, or language. It leaves no trace. Zamiatin’s death is not named, marked, or remembered. Like countless others, it is absorbed, metabolized, and erased by the structure. Suffering is not denied. It is rendered anonymous. The system does not repress pain. It dissolves it into function.

The trajectory of Perinpoul appears at first to diverge, but ultimately follows the same logic. A successful artist marked by an unassimilated trauma, the death of a child at her exhibition, she enters the Pit seeking redemption. The system does not forgive. Every gesture is translated into error. Even her final sacrifice, an attempt to save another child, produces no rupture. It does not redeem. It perpetuates. Art itself is stripped of its critical function. Goya’s Dog becomes food. Trauma is no longer represented. It is ingested. Memory is swallowed rather than transmitted.

As in the first film, the figure of the child remains radically ambiguous. The child does not embody salvation. He is carried. He does not act. He alters nothing. He functions as a message without content, a passive element within a vertical ritual. The return of Miharu reinforces this ambiguity. Positioned between care and execution, memory and threat, she appears as a figure of fractured motherhood and perverse justice. Her presence at the origin of the pyramid situates her not as exception, but as point of inception. The ritual did not begin with cruelty. It began with care distorted into command.

The Pit operates as an inverted theological system. A messianic figure is said to have fasted and then offered his flesh to feed others. His anointed followers spread the law. This is not redemption. It is parody. There is no resurrection, only circulation. Sacrifice does not liberate. It stabilizes hunger. Violence is contained by being institutionalized. The Messiah does not save. He legitimizes deprivation.

Attempts to produce alternative meaning are consistently punished. Individuals construct micro-narratives, provisional ethics, personal logics. These gestures do not threaten the system because of their content, but because they introduce plurality. Interpretation itself becomes transgression. The system does not fear evil. It fears divergence. Guilt does not arise from what is done, but from the act of meaning-making itself.

Space is an integral component of control. Verticality is not merely spatial. It is ontological. Above and below are not locations, but values. Visibility, punishment, and worth are distributed along a single axis. No surveillance is required. Architecture itself produces discipline. Every level functions as a cell. Every body becomes a surface upon which power inscribes itself.

In the final sequence, the child returns once more, not as promise, but as code. He is taken down and sent back up. He circulates. He does not interrupt. The overlapping of figures and trajectories confirms the structure’s logic. The Pit is cyclical, self-referential, recursive. There is no exit, no ascent, no transformation.

Within the contemporary cinematic landscape, The Platform 2 resonates with other architectural allegories of power. Unlike narratives in which the system can still be breached, this film abolishes the very idea of a threshold. The Pit is closed. It does not conceal an exit. It abolishes the possibility of one. What it produces is not oppression as event, but oppression as environment, as the only available horizon of meaning.

In the silence of the lowest levels, between a falling body and a rising child, one certainty remains. In the Pit, life cannot fully exist, because it is never autonomous. Death cannot fully conclude, because it is never final. What persists is only the circulation of use, the reduction of existence to function, and the repetition of a ritual that no longer needs belief in order to endure.

Bibliography

Arendt, Hannah
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.
New York: Viking Press, 1963.

Arendt, Hannah
The Origins of Totalitarianism.
New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, 1951.

Dostoevsky, Fyodor
The Brothers Karamazov.
1880.

Foucault, Michel
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.

Girard, René
Violence and the Sacred.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.

Ginzburg, Carlo
The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.

Mbembe, Achille
“Necropolitics.”
Public Culture 15, no. 1 (2003): 11–40.

Weil, Simone
The Person and the Sacred.
Essay, various editions.