The Platform, A Dissection of Power and Humanity
Film Details:
- Original Title: El Hoyo (The Platform)
- Year of Production: 2019
- Director: Galder Gaztelu-Urrutia
- Screenplay: David Desola and Pedro Rivero
- Country of Production: Spain
- Duration: 94 minutes
- Genre: Drama, horror, dystopian
- Main Cast: Iván Massagué (Goreng), Zorion Eguileor (Trimagasi), Antonia San Juan (Imoguiri), Emilio Buale (Baharat), Alexandra Masangkay (Miharu)
- International Distribution: Netflix
The Platform is not a film about hunger as lack. Hunger is the system itself. It is not an accident to be corrected, but the primary language through which power distributes life, time, and value. Inside the Pit, it is not simply decided who eats and who does not. It is decided who exists as subject and who is reduced to function. Verticality is not a metaphor layered onto this structure. It is its ontology. Above and below do not describe locations. They define worth, visibility, and survivability.
The Pit functions through a single object. The platform is not a resource, nor a neutral carrier of goods. It is law made visible. It descends according to a fixed rhythm, stopping briefly on each level, then disappearing. No level possesses reserves. There is only passage. Attempted accumulation is punished through thermal violence, rendering the space uninhabitable. Life in the Pit is therefore organized entirely around a moving absence. The platform gives and withdraws, disciplines and starves, without ever changing its logic. Even when it carries what appears to be a message, it remains the same device. The law does not suspend itself in order to transport meaning.
Goreng enters the Pit under the sign of choice. He accepts imprisonment voluntarily, framing his decision as rational and ethical. Throughout the film, he repeatedly occupies the position of the moral subject. He attempts persuasion, then regulation, then coercion. Each time, the structure absorbs his intervention. His decisions produce local shifts and immediate damage, but no transformation. The narrative insists on a repeated sequence: moral intention gives way to violence, violence produces injury and death, and the system remains intact. Choice is never absent. It is simply useless at the level of structure.
This is why Goreng functions as a false ethical subject. His agency is real, but structurally irrelevant. The film does not deny responsibility. It demonstrates its confinement. Every attempt to impose justice reproduces the same vertical logic it seeks to correct. Even the final decision to transform the mission into a message does not escape this pattern. Meaning is always forced to travel inside the very mechanism that nullifies it.
Baharat appears as the promise of alliance and ascent. His body, marked by racialized exclusion, carries the hope of collective movement upward. Yet his trajectory leads nowhere. He does not become a figure of resistance, nor a martyr of redemption. He simply collapses. His death produces no rupture and no lesson. This is not narrative negligence. It is structural necessity. Baharat embodies ontological uselessness. The system can absorb solidarity without reacting to it. Not every failure is tragic. Some failures are simply irrelevant.
Miharu introduces a different disturbance. She does not argue, reform, or persuade. She moves. Her repeated descents cut across the logic of consumption. She appears as interruption, violence, event. At first, she saves Goreng by killing Trimagasi. Later, during the final descent, she becomes a body to be saved and fails to survive. Her trajectory moves from active rupture to inert loss. This transformation is decisive. Miharu does not redeem the system, nor does she reveal its truth. She demonstrates that pure movement, even violent movement, can be neutralized without remainder. Her death produces no compensation and no meaning. It only confirms continuity.
The figure of the girl appears only at the end. Until the final descent, the film actively denies her existence. The Administration insists that no minors are present in the system. Rumors circulate about Miharu searching for her child. When Goreng and Baharat reach level 333, the last declared level, they find the girl hidden under a bed. She is alive and starving. She does not speak. She does not explain herself. She does not act. She eats.
Her appearance collapses an internal premise. The system can include what it claims to exclude and continue functioning. The mission immediately shifts. The panna cotta is no longer the message. The girl becomes the message. She is placed on the platform and sent upward. Goreng remains below, in a space that has already slipped into the metaphysical. Nothing in the structure changes. The platform continues its ascent. The law remains intact.
The girl is not salvation. She is not future. She is not biopolitical hope. She is a device that seals the system. Her silent ascent proves that contradiction does not threaten power. It stabilizes it. The presence of the child does not interrupt violence or redistribution. It confirms that the system can transport innocence without being transformed by it.
The Pit presents itself as an inverted theology. Sacrifice circulates without redemption. Bodies are offered without resurrection. Hunger becomes the only law that does not require belief. Attempts to create meaning are punished not because they are immoral, but because they introduce plurality. Interpretation itself becomes guilt. The system does not fear rebellion. It fears deviation.
In the final image, the platform rises carrying the girl. Goreng disappears below. There is no closure and no escape. Life cannot fully exist inside the Pit because it is never autonomous. Death cannot fully conclude because it is never final. What persists is the endless circulation of bodies, meanings, and failures within a structure that does not need justification in order to endure.
Bibliography
Foucault, Michel
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.
Mbembe, Achille
“Necropolitics.”
Public Culture 15, no. 1 (2003): 11–40.
Butler, Judith
Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”.
New York: Routledge, 1993.
Arendt, Hannah
Responsibility and Judgment.
New York: Schocken Books, 2003.